↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of cytotoxic, genotoxic and inflammatory responses of nanoparticles from photocopiers in three human cell lines

Overview of attention for article published in Particle and Fibre Toxicology, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of cytotoxic, genotoxic and inflammatory responses of nanoparticles from photocopiers in three human cell lines
Published in
Particle and Fibre Toxicology, August 2013
DOI 10.1186/1743-8977-10-42
Pubmed ID
Authors

Madhu Khatri, Dhimiter Bello, Anoop K Pal, Joel M Cohen, Susan Woskie, Thomas Gassert, Jiaqi Lan, April Z Gu, Philip Demokritou, Peter Gaines

Abstract

Photocopiers emit nanoparticles with complex chemical composition. Short-term exposures to modest nanoparticle concentrations triggered upper airway inflammation and oxidative stress in healthy human volunteers in a recent study. To further understand the toxicological properties of copier-emitted nanoparticles, we studied in-vitro their ability to induce cytotoxicity, pro-inflammatory cytokine release, DNA damage, and apoptosis in relevant human cell lines.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 92 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 29%
Student > Master 15 16%
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 15 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 17 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 10%
Engineering 7 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 8%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 24 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2013.
All research outputs
#15,168,964
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Particle and Fibre Toxicology
#364
of 614 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,525
of 210,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Particle and Fibre Toxicology
#11
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 614 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,604 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.