You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Developing and testing a street audit tool using Google Street View to measure environmental supportiveness for physical activity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1479-5868-10-103 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pippa Griew, Melvyn Hillsdon, Charlie Foster, Emma Coombes, Andy Jones, Paul Wilkinson |
| Abstract |
Walking for physical activity is associated with substantial health benefits for adults. Increasingly research has focused on associations between walking behaviours and neighbourhood environments including street characteristics such as pavement availability and aesthetics. Nevertheless, objective assessment of street-level data is challenging. This research investigates the reliability of a new street characteristic audit tool designed for use with Google Street View, and assesses levels of agreement between computer-based and on-site auditing. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 15 | 60% |
| Ireland | 4 | 16% |
| Australia | 2 | 8% |
| Denmark | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 3 | 12% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 20% |
| Scientists | 5 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Portugal | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 185 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 36 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 18% |
| Researcher | 20 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 43 | 23% |
| Unknown | 30 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 26 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 10% |
| Engineering | 14 | 7% |
| Design | 11 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 63 | 33% |
| Unknown | 46 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2014.
All research outputs
#2,492,923
of 24,851,605 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#887
of 2,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,066
of 205,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,851,605 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,073 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,287 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.