You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Differentiating innovation priorities among stakeholder in hospital care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6947-13-91 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mattijs S Lambooij, Marjan J Hummel |
| Abstract |
Decisions to adopt a particular innovation may vary between stakeholders because individual stakeholders may disagree on the costs and benefits involved. This may translate to disagreement between stakeholders on priorities in the implementation process, possibly explaining the slow diffusion of innovations in health care. In this study, we explore the differences in stakeholder preferences for innovations, and quantify the difference in stakeholder priorities regarding costs and benefits. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 101 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 35 | 34% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 20% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Researcher | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 14 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 19 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 14% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 15% |
| Unknown | 20 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2013.
All research outputs
#14,175,799
of 22,719,618 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#1,100
of 1,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,628
of 175,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#27
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,719,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,982 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,533 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.