↓ Skip to main content

Sharing success – understanding barriers and enablers to secondary prophylaxis delivery for rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sharing success – understanding barriers and enablers to secondary prophylaxis delivery for rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease
Published in
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, August 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12872-016-0344-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer Chamberlain-Salaun, Jane Mills, Priya M. Kevat, Marc G. W. Rémond, Graeme P. Maguire

Abstract

Rheumatic fever (RF) and rheumatic heart disease (RHD) cause considerable morbidity and mortality amongst Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander populations. Secondary antibiotic prophylaxis in the form of 4-weekly benzathine penicillin injections is the mainstay of control programs. Evidence suggests, however, that delivery rates of such prophylaxis are poor. This qualitative study used semi-structured interviews with patients, parents/care givers and health professionals, to explore the enablers of and barriers to the uptake of secondary prophylaxis. Data from participant interviews (with 11 patients/carers and 11 health practitioners) conducted in four far north Queensland sites were analyzed using the method of constant comparative analysis. Deficits in registration and recall systems and pain attributed to injections were identified as barriers to secondary prophylaxis uptake. There were also varying perceptions regarding responsibility for ensuring injection delivery. Enablers of secondary prophylaxis uptake included positive patient-healthcare provider relationships, supporting patient autonomy, education of patients, care givers and healthcare providers, and community-based service delivery. The study findings provide insights that may facilitate enhancement of secondary prophylaxis delivery systems and thereby improve uptake of secondary prophylaxis for RF/RHD.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 73 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 18%
Student > Postgraduate 7 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Researcher 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 17 23%
Unknown 20 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 23 31%