You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
RNA-Seq effectively monitors gene expression in Eutrema salsugineum plants growing in an extreme natural habitat and in controlled growth cabinet conditions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomics, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-14-578 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marc J Champigny, Wilson WL Sung, Vasile Catana, Rupa Salwan, Peter S Summers, Susan A Dudley, Nicholas J Provart, Robin K Cameron, G Brian Golding, Elizabeth A Weretilnyk |
| Abstract |
The investigation of extremophile plant species growing in their natural environment offers certain advantages, chiefly that plants adapted to severe habitats have a repertoire of stress tolerance genes that are regulated to maximize plant performance under physiologically challenging conditions. Accordingly, transcriptome sequencing offers a powerful approach to address questions concerning the influence of natural habitat on the physiology of an organism. We used RNA sequencing of Eutrema salsugineum, an extremophile relative of Arabidopsis thaliana, to investigate the extent to which genetic variation and controlled versus natural environments contribute to differences between transcript profiles. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 91 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 19% |
| Researcher | 18 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 10 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 59 | 61% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 20 | 21% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 12 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2013.
All research outputs
#20,200,843
of 22,719,618 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#9,250
of 10,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,493
of 200,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#118
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,719,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,627 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,072 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.