↓ Skip to main content

The role of retinoic acid in hepatic lipid homeostasis defined by genomic binding and transcriptome profiling

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The role of retinoic acid in hepatic lipid homeostasis defined by genomic binding and transcriptome profiling
Published in
BMC Genomics, August 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-14-575
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuqi He, Lei Gong, Yaping Fang, Qi Zhan, Hui-Xin Liu, Yanliu Lu, Grace L Guo, Lois Lehman-McKeeman, Jianwen Fang, Yu-Jui Yvonne Wan

Abstract

The eyes and skin are obvious retinoid target organs. Vitamin A deficiency causes night blindness and retinoids are widely used to treat acne and psoriasis. However, more than 90% of total body retinol is stored in liver stellate cells. In addition, hepatocytes produce the largest amount of retinol binding protein and cellular retinoic acid binding protein to mobilize retinol from the hepatic storage pool and deliver retinol to its receptors, respectively. Furthermore, hepatocytes express the highest amount of retinoid x receptor alpha (RXRα) among all the cell types. Surprisingly, the function of endogenous retinoids in the liver has received very little attention.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 2%
Unknown 59 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 15%
Researcher 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Other 5 8%
Other 11 18%
Unknown 13 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 15 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2013.
All research outputs
#15,278,165
of 22,719,618 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#6,665
of 10,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,592
of 200,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#75
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,719,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,627 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,084 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.