You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Open innovation as a new paradigm for global collaborations in health
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Globalization and Health, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1744-8603-9-41 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Patricia Dandonoli |
| Abstract |
Open innovation, which refers to combining internal and external ideas and internal and external paths to market in order to achieve advances in processes or technologies, is an attractive paradigm for structuring collaborations between developed and developing country entities and people. Such open innovation collaborations can be designed to foster true co-creation among partners in rich and poor settings, thereby breaking down hierarchies and creating greater impact and value for each partner. Using an example from Concern Worldwide's Innovations for Maternal, Newborn &Child Health initiative, this commentary describes an early-stage pilot project built around open innovation in a low resource setting, which puts communities at the center of a process involving a wide range of partners and expertise, and considers how it could be adapted and make more impactful and sustainable by extending the collaboration to include developed country partners. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 31% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 13% |
| Belgium | 1 | 6% |
| Mexico | 1 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 44% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 38% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 155 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 39 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 11% |
| Researcher | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 31 | 19% |
| Unknown | 25 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 35 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 9% |
| Engineering | 13 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 40 | 25% |
| Unknown | 30 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2014.
All research outputs
#4,136,681
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Globalization and Health
#613
of 1,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,186
of 211,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Globalization and Health
#11
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,825 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.