↓ Skip to main content

Hysterosalpingocontrast sonography (HyCoSy): evaluation of the pain perception, side effects and complications

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Imaging, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hysterosalpingocontrast sonography (HyCoSy): evaluation of the pain perception, side effects and complications
Published in
BMC Medical Imaging, August 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2342-13-28
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roberto Marci, Immacolata Marcucci, Aurelio Aniceto Marcucci, Nicolina Pacini, Pietro Salacone, Annalisa Sebastianelli, Luisa Caponecchia, Giuseppe Lo Monte, Rocco Rago

Abstract

Tubal and uterine cavity diseases commonly compromise female fertility. At the present time, hysteroscopy, laparoscopy with chromopertubation and RX-Hysterosalpingography (RX-HSG) are widely accepted screening procedures enabling the effective assessment of both tubal patency and uterine cavity. Nevertheless, consistent evidence supports the reliability of Hysterosalpingocontrast sonography (HyCoSy) in uterine cavity and tubal patency investigation, as a part of the standard infertility work-up. This prospective study was aimed at evaluating the tolerability of the technique as well as the incidence of related side effects and complications in a large series of infertile patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 2%
Unknown 41 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 14%
Researcher 6 14%
Student > Postgraduate 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 12 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 48%
Unspecified 1 2%
Mathematics 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 13 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2013.
All research outputs
#20,200,843
of 22,719,618 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Imaging
#444
of 589 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,656
of 199,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Imaging
#12
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,719,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 589 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,041 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.