You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cell-specific deletion of C1qa identifies microglia as the dominant source of C1q in mouse brain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Neuroinflammation, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12974-017-0814-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maria I. Fonseca, Shu-Hui Chu, Michael X. Hernandez, Melody J. Fang, Lila Modarresi, Pooja Selvan, Grant R. MacGregor, Andrea J. Tenner |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 300 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 300 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 68 | 23% |
| Researcher | 46 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 39 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 4% |
| Other | 37 | 12% |
| Unknown | 65 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 93 | 31% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 37 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 10% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 7% |
| Unknown | 73 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2017.
All research outputs
#4,978,221
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#930
of 2,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,673
of 328,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#13
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,668 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.