You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A mutation in the c-Fos gene associated with congenital generalized lipodystrophy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1750-1172-8-119 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Birgit Knebel, Jorg Kotzka, Stefan Lehr, Sonja Hartwig, Haluk Avci, Sylvia Jacob, Ulrike Nitzgen, Martina Schiller, Winfried März, Michael M Hoffmann, Eva Seemanova, Jutta Haas, Dirk Muller-Wieland |
| Abstract |
Congenital generalized lipodystrophy (CGL) or Berardinelli-Seip congenital lipodystrophy (BSCL) is a rare genetic syndrome characterized by the absence of adipose tissue. As CGL is thought to be related to malfunctions in adipocyte development, genes involved in the mechanisms of adipocyte biology and maintenance or differentiation of adipocytes, especially transcription factors are candidates. Several genes (BSCL1-4) were found to be associated to the syndrome but not all CGL patients carry mutations in these genes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| France | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 23% |
| Researcher | 6 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 19% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 19% |
| Unknown | 1 | 3% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 10% |
| Engineering | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 19% |
| Unknown | 4 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2014.
All research outputs
#14,175,799
of 22,719,618 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#1,552
of 2,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,001
of 197,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#20
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,719,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,603 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,289 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.