You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A cost-effectiveness analysis of a 10-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in children in six Latin American countries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1478-7547-11-21 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sebastián García Martí, Lisandro Colantonio, Ariel Bardach, Julieta Galante, Analía Lopez, Joaquín Caporale, Gerhart Knerer, Jorge Alberto Gomez, Federico Augustovski, Andrés Pichon-Riviere |
| Abstract |
A recently developed 10-valent pneumococcal non-typeable H influenzae protein D-conjugate vaccine (PHiD-CV) is expected to afford protection against more than two thirds of isolates causing IPD in children in Latin America, and also against acute otitis media caused by both Spn and NTHi. The objective of this study is to assess the cost-effectiveness of PHiD-CV in comparison to non-vaccination in children under 10 years of age in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico and Peru. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 114 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 24 | 21% |
| Researcher | 17 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 11% |
| Unknown | 32 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 27% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 9 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 17% |
| Unknown | 35 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2021.
All research outputs
#2,655,973
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#50
of 533 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,508
of 211,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 533 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.