↓ Skip to main content

Shifting perceptions: a pre-post study to assess the impact of a senior resident rotation bundle

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Shifting perceptions: a pre-post study to assess the impact of a senior resident rotation bundle
Published in
BMC Medical Education, August 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6920-13-115
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gabriel Fabreau, Meghan Elliott, Suneil Khanna, Evan Minty, Jean E Wallace, Jill de Grood, Adriane Lewin, Garielle Brown, Aleem Bharwani, Janet Gilmour, Jane B Lemaire

Abstract

Extended duty hours for residents are associated with negative consequences. Strategies to accommodate duty hour restrictions may also have unintended impacts. To eliminate extended duty hours and potentially lessen these impacts, we developed a senior resident rotation bundle that integrates a night float system, educational sessions on sleep hygiene, an electronic handover tool, and a simulation-based medical education curriculum. The aim of this study was to assess internal medicine residents' perceptions of the impact of the bundle on three domains: the senior residents' wellness, ability to deliver quality health care, and medical education experience.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Master 9 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Other 4 7%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 15 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 11%
Psychology 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 18 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2021.
All research outputs
#3,924,046
of 22,719,618 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#642
of 3,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,882
of 199,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#11
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,719,618 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,299 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,827 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.