You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The school environment and student health: a systematic review and meta-ethnography of qualitative research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-798 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Farah Jamal, Adam Fletcher, Angela Harden, Helene Wells, James Thomas, Chris Bonell |
| Abstract |
There is increasing interest in promoting young people's health by modifying the school environment. However, existing research offers little guidance on how the school context enables or constrains students' health behaviours, or how students' backgrounds relate to these processes. For these reasons, this paper reports on a meta-ethnography of qualitative studies examining: through what processes does the school environment (social and physical) influence young people's health? |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 28 | 62% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 13 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 30 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 18% |
| Scientists | 6 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 347 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 1% |
| Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 339 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 49 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 45 | 13% |
| Researcher | 42 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 30 | 9% |
| Other | 59 | 17% |
| Unknown | 91 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 67 | 19% |
| Psychology | 53 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 14 | 4% |
| Other | 51 | 15% |
| Unknown | 111 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2018.
All research outputs
#1,306,267
of 25,959,914 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,491
of 17,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,140
of 212,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#26
of 292 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,959,914 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,866 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,777 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 292 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.