↓ Skip to main content

9/11-Related Experiences and Tasks of Landfill and Barge Workers: Qualitative Analysis from the World Trade Center Health Registry

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
9/11-Related Experiences and Tasks of Landfill and Barge Workers: Qualitative Analysis from the World Trade Center Health Registry
Published in
BMC Public Health, May 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-11-321
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christine C Ekenga, Katherine E Scheu, James E Cone, Steven D Stellman, Mark R Farfel

Abstract

Few studies have documented the experiences of individuals who participated in the recovery and cleanup efforts at the World Trade Center Recovery Operation at Fresh Kills Landfill, on debris loading piers, and on transport barges after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 7%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 3%
Ghana 1 3%
Unknown 25 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Professor 3 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Other 7 24%
Unknown 6 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 24%
Psychology 4 14%
Social Sciences 3 10%
Environmental Science 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 8 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,920,308
of 23,314,015 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,121
of 15,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,511
of 111,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#28
of 203 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,314,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,200 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,917 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 203 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.