↓ Skip to main content

Microbes, metagenomes and marine mammals: enabling the next generation of scientist to enter the genomic era

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
34 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Microbes, metagenomes and marine mammals: enabling the next generation of scientist to enter the genomic era
Published in
BMC Genomics, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-14-600
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert Alan Edwards, John Matthew Haggerty, Noriko Cassman, Julia Christine Busch, Kristen Aguinaldo, Sowmya Chinta, Meredith Houle Vaughn, Robert Morey, Timothy T Harkins, Clotilde Teiling, Karin Fredrikson, Elizabeth Ann Dinsdale

Abstract

The revolution in DNA sequencing technology continues unabated, and is affecting all aspects of the biological and medical sciences. The training and recruitment of the next generation of researchers who are able to use and exploit the new technology is severely lacking and potentially negatively influencing research and development efforts to advance genome biology. Here we present a cross-disciplinary course that provides undergraduate students with practical experience in running a next generation sequencing instrument through to the analysis and annotation of the generated DNA sequences.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 5%
Germany 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 92 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 16%
Student > Master 12 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 9%
Other 7 7%
Other 22 21%
Unknown 11 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 14%
Environmental Science 6 6%
Computer Science 4 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 3%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 17 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2014.
All research outputs
#1,056,398
of 24,336,902 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#158
of 10,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,205
of 201,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#4
of 140 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,336,902 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,957 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,726 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 140 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.