↓ Skip to main content

Network coordination following discharge from psychiatric inpatient treatment: a study protocol

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Network coordination following discharge from psychiatric inpatient treatment: a study protocol
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-244x-13-220
Pubmed ID
Authors

Agnes von Wyl, Gisela Heim, Nicolas Rüsch, Wulf Rössler, Andreas Andreae

Abstract

Inadequate discharge planning following inpatient stays is a major issue in the provision of a high standard of care for patients who receive psychiatric treatment. Studies have shown that half of patients who had no pre-discharge contact with outpatient services do not keep their first outpatient appointment. Additionally, discharged patients who are not well linked to their outpatient care networks are at twice the risk of re-hospitalization. The aim of this study is to investigate if the Post-Discharge Network Coordination Program at ipw has a demonstrably significant impact on the frequency and duration of patient re-hospitalization. Subjects are randomly assigned to either the treatment group or to the control group. The treatment group participates in the Post-Discharge Network Coordination Program. The control group receives treatment as usual with no additional social support. Further outcome variables include: social support, change in psychiatric symptoms, quality of life, and independence in daily functioning.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 74 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 23%
Researcher 12 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 5%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 13 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 18 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 11%
Social Sciences 7 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 16 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2013.
All research outputs
#20,200,843
of 22,719,618 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#4,171
of 4,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,365
of 196,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#64
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,719,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,649 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.