↓ Skip to main content

Comparative analysis of two methods for measuring sales volumes during malaria medicine outlet surveys

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative analysis of two methods for measuring sales volumes during malaria medicine outlet surveys
Published in
Malaria Journal, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-12-311
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edith Patouillard, Immo Kleinschmidt, Kara Hanson, Sochea Pok, Benjamin Palafox, Sarah Tougher, Kate O’Connell, Catherine Goodman

Abstract

There is increased interest in using commercial providers for improving access to quality malaria treatment. Understanding their current role is an essential first step, notably in terms of the volume of diagnostics and anti-malarials they sell. Sales volume data can be used to measure the importance of different provider and product types, frequency of parasitological diagnosis and impact of interventions. Several methods for measuring sales volumes are available, yet all have methodological challenges and evidence is lacking on the comparability of different methods.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 6%
Cambodia 1 3%
Unknown 28 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 26%
Lecturer 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Researcher 2 6%
Other 7 23%
Unknown 7 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 7 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2013.
All research outputs
#4,969,136
of 24,400,706 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#1,234
of 5,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,193
of 201,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#14
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,400,706 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,827 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,827 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.