You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Informed choice about breast cancer prevention: randomized controlled trial of an online decision aid intervention
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Breast Cancer Research, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/bcr3468 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ida J Korfage, Andrea Fuhrel-Forbis, Peter A Ubel, Brian J Zikmund-Fisher, Sarah M Greene, Jennifer B McClure, Dylan M Smith, Sharon Hensley Alford, Angela Fagerlin |
| Abstract |
Tamoxifen and raloxifene are chemopreventive drugs that can reduce women’s relative risk of primary breast cancer by 50%; however, most women eligible for these drugs have chosen not to take them. The reasons for low uptake may be related to women’s knowledge or attitudes towards the drugs. We aimed to examine the impact of an online breast cancer chemoprevention decision aid (DA) on informed intentions and decisions of women at high risk of breast cancer. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 98 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 15% |
| Researcher | 14 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 11% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 24 | 24% |
| Unknown | 18 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 32% |
| Psychology | 12 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 26 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2014.
All research outputs
#18,345,822
of 22,719,618 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research
#1,591
of 1,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,816
of 198,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research
#22
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,719,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,889 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.