↓ Skip to main content

State of the Art: Why do the lungs of patients with cystic fibrosis become infected and why can't they clear the infection?

Overview of attention for article published in Respiratory Research, August 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
187 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
197 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
State of the Art: Why do the lungs of patients with cystic fibrosis become infected and why can't they clear the infection?
Published in
Respiratory Research, August 2003
DOI 10.1186/1465-9921-4-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

James F Chmiel, Pamela B Davis

Abstract

Cystic Fibrosis (CF) lung disease, which is characterized by airway obstruction, chronic bacterial infection, and an excessive inflammatory response, is responsible for most of the morbidity and mortality. Early in life, CF patients become infected with a limited spectrum of bacteria, especially P. aeruginosa. New data now indicate that decreased depth of periciliary fluid and abnormal hydration of mucus, which impede mucociliary clearance, contribute to initial infection. Diminished production of the antibacterial molecule nitric oxide, increased bacterial binding sites (e.g., asialo GM-1) on CF airway epithelial cells, and adaptations made by the bacteria to the airway microenvironment, including the production of virulence factors and the ability to organize into a biofilm, contribute to susceptibility to initial bacterial infection. Once the patient is infected, an overzealous inflammatory response in the CF lung likely contributes to the host's inability to eradicate infection. In response to increased IL-8 and leukotriene B4 production, neutrophils infiltrate the lung where they release mediators, such as elastase, that further inhibit host defenses, cripple opsonophagocytosis, impair mucociliary clearance, and damage airway wall architecture. The combination of these events favors the persistence of bacteria in the airway. Until a cure is discovered, further investigations into therapies that relieve obstruction, control infection, and attenuate inflammation offer the best hope of limiting damage to host tissues and prolonging survival.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
India 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 190 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 22%
Student > Bachelor 34 17%
Student > Master 26 13%
Researcher 25 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 5%
Other 29 15%
Unknown 31 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 38 19%
Immunology and Microbiology 21 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 6%
Other 23 12%
Unknown 34 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2017.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#2,702
of 3,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,243
of 54,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 54,008 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.