You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Yield of intermittent versus continuous EEG in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest treated with hypothermia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc12879 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vincent Alvarez, Alba Sierra-Marcos, Mauro Oddo, Andrea O Rossetti |
| Abstract |
Electroencephalography (EEG) has a central role in the outcome prognostication in subjects with anoxic/hypoxic encephalopathy following a cardiac arrest (CA). Continuous EEG monitoring (cEEG) has been consistently developed and studied; however, its yield as compared to repeated standard EEG (sEEG) is unknown. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Czechia | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 88 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Researcher | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 24 | 26% |
| Unknown | 21 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 52% |
| Neuroscience | 10 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 25 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2015.
All research outputs
#7,047,316
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,931
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,939
of 209,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#38
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,005 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.