↓ Skip to main content

Label-free data standardization for clinical metabolomics

Overview of attention for article published in BioData Mining, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Label-free data standardization for clinical metabolomics
Published in
BioData Mining, February 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13040-017-0132-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Petr G. Lokhov, Dmitri L. Maslov, Oleg N. Kharibin, Elena E. Balashova, Alexander I. Archakov

Abstract

In metabolomics, thousands of substances can be detected in a single assay. This capacity motivates the development of metabolomics testing, which is currently a very promising option for improving laboratory diagnostics. However, the simultaneous measurement of an enormous number of substances leads to metabolomics data often representing concentrations only in conditional units, while laboratory diagnostics generally require actual concentrations. To convert metabolomics data to actual concentrations, calibration curves need to be generated for each substance, and this process represents a significant challenge due to the number of substances that are present in the metabolomics data. To overcome this limitation, a label-free standardization algorithm for metabolomics data is required. It was discovered that blood plasma has a set of stable internal standards. The appropriate usage of these newly discovered internal standards provides a background for the label-free standardization of metabolomics data that underlies the SantaOmics (Standardization algorithm for nonlinearly transformed arrays in Omics) algorithm. In this study, using the knee point, it was shown that the metabolomics data can be converted by SantaOmics into a standardized scale that can substitute actual concentration measurements, thus making the metabolomics data directly comparable with each other as well as with reference data presented in the same scale. The developed algorithm sufficiently facilitates the usage of metabolomics data in laboratory diagnostics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 25%
Student > Master 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 6 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 9%
Computer Science 2 6%
Chemistry 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 8 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2017.
All research outputs
#15,450,375
of 22,959,818 outputs
Outputs from BioData Mining
#226
of 308 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,478
of 310,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioData Mining
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,959,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 308 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.