You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Judging the quality of evidence in reviews of prognostic factor research: adapting the GRADE framework
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2046-4053-2-71 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anna Huguet, Jill A Hayden, Jennifer Stinson, Patrick J McGrath, Christine T Chambers, Michelle E Tougas, Lori Wozney |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 33% |
| Ireland | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 197 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 40 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 16% |
| Researcher | 24 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 10% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 25 | 12% |
| Unknown | 45 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 79 | 39% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 8% |
| Psychology | 7 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Sports and Recreations | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 28 | 14% |
| Unknown | 62 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2021.
All research outputs
#3,247,886
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#575
of 2,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,078
of 211,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#9
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,108 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.