↓ Skip to main content

Avian blood parasite infection during the non-breeding season: an overlooked issue in declining populations?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
12 X users
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Avian blood parasite infection during the non-breeding season: an overlooked issue in declining populations?
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6785-13-30
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jenny C Dunn, Simon J Goodman, Tim G Benton, Keith C Hamer

Abstract

Pathogens and parasites can have major impacts on host population dynamics, both through direct mortality and via indirect effects. Both types of effect may be stronger in species whose populations are already under pressure. We investigated the potential for blood parasites to impact upon their hosts at the immunological, physiological and population level during the non-breeding season using a declining population of yellowhammers Emberiza citrinella as a model.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 3 3%
Lithuania 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 109 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 19%
Researcher 21 18%
Student > Master 18 15%
Student > Bachelor 16 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 16 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 60 51%
Environmental Science 20 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 23 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,548,569
of 25,721,020 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#359
of 3,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,209
of 210,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#8
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,721,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,721 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,104 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.