You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Review of studies mapping from quality of life or clinical measures to EQ-5D: an online database
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1477-7525-11-151 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Helen Dakin |
| Abstract |
Systematic literature searches were conducted to identify studies that conducted statistical mapping to predict EQ-5D utilities or responses from any source instrument and reported the estimated algorithms in sufficient detail to allow other researchers to use them to predict EQ-5D in other studies. Ninety studies reporting 121 mapping algorithms met the inclusion criteria. The studies estimated EQ-5D utilities from 80 source instruments. All but two studies included direct utility mapping to predict EQ-5D utilities, while 20 studies (22%) conducted response mapping to predict responses to each EQ-5D domain. Seventy-two studies (80%) explored ordinary least squares regression and 16 (18%) used censored least absolute deviations (CLAD) models. The details of the studies identified are made available in an online database, which will be updated regularly to enable researchers to easily identify studies that can help them to estimate utilities for economic evaluation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Spain | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 122 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 31 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 17% |
| Unknown | 13 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 27% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 27 | 21% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 22 | 17% |
| Unknown | 28 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2018.
All research outputs
#7,205,554
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#833
of 2,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,470
of 209,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#6
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,080 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.