↓ Skip to main content

The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation for refractory angina (RASCAL study): study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation for refractory angina (RASCAL study): study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-14-57
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sam Eldabe, John Raphael, Simon Thomson, Andrea Manca, Mark de Belder, Rajesh Aggarwal, Matthew Banks, Morag Brookes, Susan Merotra, Rashidat Adeniba, Ed Davies, Rod S Taylor

Abstract

The RASCAL (Refractory Angina Spinal Cord stimulation and usuAL care) pilot study seeks to assess the feasibility of a definitive trial to assess if addition of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) to usual care is clinically superior and more cost-effective than usual care alone in patients with refractory angina.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 107 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 15%
Researcher 15 14%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Other 8 7%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 33 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 14%
Neuroscience 7 6%
Psychology 6 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 5%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 35 32%