↓ Skip to main content

Self-reporting and measurement of body mass index in adolescents: refusals and validity, and the possible role of socioeconomic and health-related factors

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
211 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Self-reporting and measurement of body mass index in adolescents: refusals and validity, and the possible role of socioeconomic and health-related factors
Published in
BMC Public Health, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-815
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nearkasen Chau, Kénora Chau, Aurélie Mayet, Michèle Baumann, Stéphane Legleye, Bruno Falissard

Abstract

Body mass index assessment using self-reported height and weight (BMIsr) can encounter refusals and under/over-reporting while for assessment with measured data (BMIm) refusals can be more frequent. This could relate to socioeconomic and health-related factors. We explored these issues by investigating numerous potential factors: gender, age, family structure, father's occupation, income, physical/sports activity, subjective weight perception, school performance, unhealthy behaviours, physical/psychological health, social relationships, living environment, having sustained violence, sexual abuse, and involvement in violence.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 207 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 20%
Researcher 34 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 15%
Student > Bachelor 16 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Other 31 15%
Unknown 44 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 36 17%
Psychology 33 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 32 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 6%
Sports and Recreations 7 3%
Other 37 18%
Unknown 54 26%