You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Perioperative goal-directed hemodynamic therapy based on radial arterial pulse pressure variation and continuous cardiac index trending reduces postoperative complications after major abdominal surgery: a multi-center, prospective, randomized study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc12885 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cornelie Salzwedel, Jaume Puig, Arne Carstens, Berthold Bein, Zsolt Molnar, Krisztian Kiss, Ayyaz Hussain, Javier Belda, Mikhail Y Kirov, Samir G Sakka, Daniel A Reuter |
| Abstract |
Several single-center studies and meta-analyses have shown that perioperative goal-directed therapy may significantly improve outcomes in general surgical patients. We hypothesized that using a treatment algorithm based on pulse pressure variation, cardiac index trending by radial artery pulse contour analysis, and mean arterial pressure in a study group (SG), would result in reduced complications, reduced length of hospital stay and quicker return of bowel movement postoperatively in abdominal surgical patients, when compared to a control group (CG). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 172 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 32 | 18% |
| Researcher | 24 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 49 | 27% |
| Unknown | 30 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 124 | 68% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Unknown | 38 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2022.
All research outputs
#2,243,441
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,960
of 6,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,129
of 214,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#12
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,637 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,256 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.