↓ Skip to main content

Insights into the role of the junctional region of Plasmodium falciparum dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthase

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Insights into the role of the junctional region of Plasmodium falciparum dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthase
Published in
Malaria Journal, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-12-91
Pubmed ID
Authors

Natpasit Chaianantakul, Rachada Sirawaraporn, Worachart Sirawaraporn

Abstract

Plasmodium falciparum dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthase (pfDHFR-TS) is a well-defined target of anti-malarial drug, such as pyrimethamine and cycloguanil. Emergence of malaria parasites resistant to these drugs has been shown to be associated with point mutations of the gene coding for the target enzymes. Although the 3D-structure of P. falciparum bifunctional pfDHFR-TS has been reported previously, relatively little is known about the interactions between the pfDHFR and pfTS domains and the roles of the junctional region that links the two domains together. Therefore, a thorough understanding of the interaction of the two domains and the role of the junctional region of this target is important as the knowledge could assist the development of new effective anti-malarial drugs aimed at overcoming drug-resistant malaria.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 38 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 23%
Student > Master 7 18%
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Researcher 3 8%
Lecturer 2 5%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 6 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 8 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 8 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2016.
All research outputs
#6,261,312
of 22,721,584 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#1,766
of 5,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,410
of 195,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#25
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,721,584 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,547 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.