↓ Skip to main content

The effect of a biphasic injectable bone substitute on the interface strength in a rabbit knee prosthesis model

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effect of a biphasic injectable bone substitute on the interface strength in a rabbit knee prosthesis model
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/1749-799x-8-25
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vasilis Zampelis, Magnus Tägil, Lars Lidgren, Hanna Isaksson, Isam Atroshi, Jian-Sheng Wang

Abstract

In joint prosthetic surgery, various methods are used to provide implant stability. We used an injectable bone substitute, composed of calcium sulfate/hydroxyapatite, as bone defect filler to stabilize a tibia prosthesis in an experimental rabbit model. The aim of the study was to investigate and compare the stability of prosthetic fixation with and without the use of an injectable bone substitute.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 13%
Student > Master 6 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Researcher 3 7%
Other 11 24%
Unknown 11 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 38%
Materials Science 5 11%
Engineering 4 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 13 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2013.
All research outputs
#4,369,647
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#141
of 1,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,603
of 209,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,627 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,801 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.