You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Carbon nanotubes as a novel tool for vaccination against infectious diseases and cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1477-3155-11-30 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Riccardo Gottardi, Bruno Douradinha |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 27% |
| France | 1 | 9% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 82% |
| Scientists | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 79 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 15% |
| Researcher | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 18 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 10 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 11% |
| Engineering | 9 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 15 | 19% |
| Unknown | 22 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2024.
All research outputs
#4,689,344
of 25,761,363 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#182
of 2,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,416
of 211,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,761,363 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,005 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,760 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them