The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A systematic review of the effectiveness of mental health promotion interventions for young people in low and middle income countries
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, September 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-835 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Margaret M Barry, Aleisha M Clarke, Rachel Jenkins, Vikram Patel |
Abstract |
This systematic review provides a narrative synthesis of the evidence on the effectiveness of mental health promotion interventions for young people in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). Commissioned by the WHO, a review of the evidence for mental health promotion interventions across the lifespan from early years to adulthood was conducted. This paper reports on the findings for interventions promoting the positive mental health of young people (aged 6-18 years) in school and community-based settings. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 5 | 13% |
Australia | 3 | 8% |
Canada | 2 | 5% |
United States | 2 | 5% |
Finland | 1 | 3% |
Spain | 1 | 3% |
Ireland | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 23 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 25 | 66% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 18% |
Scientists | 6 | 16% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 954 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
Brazil | 2 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Colombia | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 940 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 162 | 17% |
Researcher | 105 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 105 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 88 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 71 | 7% |
Other | 144 | 15% |
Unknown | 279 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 185 | 19% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 132 | 14% |
Social Sciences | 116 | 12% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 94 | 10% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 17 | 2% |
Other | 103 | 11% |
Unknown | 307 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 101. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2024.
All research outputs
#445,878
of 26,542,140 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#414
of 18,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,186
of 212,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#9
of 310 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,542,140 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,289 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,780 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 310 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.