↓ Skip to main content

A systematic review of the effectiveness of mental health promotion interventions for young people in low and middle income countries

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
5 policy sources
twitter
41 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
281 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
798 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A systematic review of the effectiveness of mental health promotion interventions for young people in low and middle income countries
Published in
BMC Public Health, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-835
Pubmed ID
Authors

Margaret M Barry, Aleisha M Clarke, Rachel Jenkins, Vikram Patel

Abstract

This systematic review provides a narrative synthesis of the evidence on the effectiveness of mental health promotion interventions for young people in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). Commissioned by the WHO, a review of the evidence for mental health promotion interventions across the lifespan from early years to adulthood was conducted. This paper reports on the findings for interventions promoting the positive mental health of young people (aged 6-18 years) in school and community-based settings.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 798 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 784 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 153 19%
Researcher 98 12%
Student > Bachelor 95 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 85 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 64 8%
Other 126 16%
Unknown 177 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 171 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 119 15%
Social Sciences 110 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 90 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 2%
Other 87 11%
Unknown 204 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2022.
All research outputs
#816,443
of 22,568,248 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#860
of 14,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,100
of 180,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,568,248 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,652 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,839 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.