↓ Skip to main content

Secular trends of salted fish consumption and nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a multi-jurisdiction ecological study in 8 regions from 3 continents

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Secular trends of salted fish consumption and nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a multi-jurisdiction ecological study in 8 regions from 3 continents
Published in
BMC Cancer, June 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2407-13-298
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hiu-Ying Lau, Chit-Ming Leung, Yap-Hang Chan, Anne Wing-Mui Lee, Dora Lai-Wan Kwong, Maria Li Lung, Tai-Hing Lam

Abstract

Despite salted fish being a classical risk factor of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (NPC), whether secular trends in salted fish consumption worldwide accounted for changes in NPC rates were unknown. The relationship between vegetable and cigarette consumption to NPC risk worldwide were also largely uncertain. We investigated the longitudinal trends in standardised NPC incidence/mortality rates across 8 regions and their associations with secular trends in salted fish, vegetable and tobacco consumptions.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Unknown 85 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 16%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Postgraduate 7 8%
Researcher 6 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 32 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Psychology 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 34 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2023.
All research outputs
#6,364,961
of 23,485,204 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#1,590
of 8,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,789
of 198,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#18
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,485,204 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,486 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,567 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.