You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Parallel evolution of genome structure and transcriptional landscape in the Epsilonproteobacteria
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomics, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-14-616 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ida Porcelli, Mark Reuter, Bruce M Pearson, Thomas Wilhelm, Arnoud HM van Vliet |
| Abstract |
Gene reshuffling, point mutations and horizontal gene transfer contribute to bacterial genome variation, but require the genome to rewire its transcriptional circuitry to ensure that inserted, mutated or reshuffled genes are transcribed at appropriate levels. The genomes of Epsilonproteobacteria display very low synteny, due to high levels of reshuffling and reorganisation of gene order, but still share a significant number of gene orthologs allowing comparison. Here we present the primary transcriptome of the pathogenic Epsilonproteobacterium Campylobacter jejuni, and have used this for comparative and predictive transcriptomics in the Epsilonproteobacteria. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 25% |
| Malawi | 1 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| France | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 75% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Greece | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 61 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 26% |
| Researcher | 13 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 15% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 15% |
| Unknown | 7 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 33 | 50% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 18% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2016.
All research outputs
#1,867,376
of 25,388,177 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#404
of 11,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,222
of 210,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#7
of 207 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,388,177 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,246 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,816 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 207 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.