You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Avian haemosporidian persistence and co-infection in great tits at the individual level
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2875-12-40 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Juan van Rooyen, Fabrice Lalubin, Olivier Glaizot, Philippe Christe |
| Abstract |
Many studies have tracked the distribution and persistence of avian haemosporidian communities across space and time at the population level, but few studies have investigated these aspects of infection at the individual level over time. Important aspects of parasite infection at the individual level can be missed if only trends at the population level are studied. This study aimed to determine how persistent Haemosporida are in great tit individuals recaptured over several years, whether parasitaemia differed by parasite lineage (mitochondrial cytochrome b haplotype) and how co-infection (i.e. concurrent infection with multiple genera of parasites) affects parasitaemia and body mass. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Lithuania | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 153 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 32 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 23 | 14% |
| Unknown | 21 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 92 | 57% |
| Environmental Science | 11 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 5% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 6 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Unknown | 28 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2014.
All research outputs
#14,760,611
of 22,721,584 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#4,225
of 5,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,798
of 282,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#62
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,721,584 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,549 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.