↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: Evaluation of the Clinical Value of ELISA based on MPT64 Antibody Aptamer for Serological Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erratum to: Evaluation of the Clinical Value of ELISA based on MPT64 Antibody Aptamer for Serological Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-13-430
Pubmed ID
Authors

Changtai Zhu, Jinming Liu, Yang Ling, Hua Yang, Zhonghua Liu, Ruijuan Zheng, Lianhua Qin, Zhongyi Hu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 1 25%
Unknown 3 75%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 50%
Student > Master 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 50%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2013.
All research outputs
#20,202,510
of 22,721,584 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#6,442
of 7,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,745
of 198,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#113
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,721,584 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,659 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,485 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.