You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Programmatic assessment of competency-based workplace learning: when theory meets practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Education, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6920-13-123 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Harold GJ Bok, Pim W Teunissen, Robert P Favier, Nancy J Rietbroek, Lars FH Theyse, Harold Brommer, Jan CM Haarhuis, Peter van Beukelen, Cees PM van der Vleuten, Debbie ADC Jaarsma |
| Abstract |
In competency-based medical education emphasis has shifted towards outcomes, capabilities, and learner-centeredness. Together with a focus on sustained evidence of professional competence this calls for new methods of teaching and assessment. Recently, medical educators advocated the use of a holistic, programmatic approach towards assessment. Besides maximum facilitation of learning it should improve the validity and reliability of measurements and documentation of competence development. We explored how, in a competency-based curriculum, current theories on programmatic assessment interacted with educational practice. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 514 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Thailand | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 507 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 67 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 53 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 40 | 8% |
| Researcher | 39 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 39 | 8% |
| Other | 166 | 32% |
| Unknown | 110 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 201 | 39% |
| Social Sciences | 68 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 4% |
| Psychology | 17 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 15 | 3% |
| Other | 69 | 13% |
| Unknown | 122 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2013.
All research outputs
#14,633,585
of 22,721,584 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#2,116
of 3,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,890
of 198,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#27
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,721,584 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,299 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,457 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.