You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
3D transoesophageal echocardiography in the TAVI sizing arena: should we do it and how do we do it?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Echo Research & Practice, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1530/erp-16-0041 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Caroline Bleakley, Mehdi Eskandari, Mark Monaghan |
| Abstract |
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) was initially proven as an alternative to valve replacement therapy in those beyond established risk thresholds for conventional surgery. With time the technique has been methodically refined and offered to a progressively lower risk cohort, and with this evolution has come that of the significant imaging requirements of valve implantation. This review discusses the role of transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) in the current TAVI arena, aligning it with that of cardiac computed tomography, and outlining how TOE can be used most effectively both prior to and during TAVI in order to optimise outcomes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 60 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 13% |
| Malaysia | 3 | 5% |
| Mexico | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Italy | 2 | 3% |
| Argentina | 2 | 3% |
| Colombia | 2 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 20 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 38 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 10% |
| Scientists | 4 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 11% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 17% |
| Unknown | 10 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 56% |
| Engineering | 4 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2018.
All research outputs
#1,127,000
of 25,394,081 outputs
Outputs from Echo Research & Practice
#26
of 269 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,802
of 324,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Echo Research & Practice
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,081 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 269 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.