You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Aetiology of biliary atresia: what is actually known?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, August 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1750-1172-8-128 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Claus Petersen, Mark Davenport |
Abstract |
Biliary atresia (BA) is a rare disease of unknown etiology and unpredictable outcome, even when there has been timely diagnosis and exemplary surgery. It has been the commonest indication for liver transplantation during childhood for the past 20 years. Hence much clinical and basic research has been directed at elucidating the origin and pathology of BA. This review summarizes the current clinical variations of BA in humans, its occasional appearance in animals and its various manifestations in the laboratory as an experimental model. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 40% |
Spain | 1 | 20% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
Turkey | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 60% |
Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 2 | 2% |
Unknown | 109 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 15% |
Student > Master | 13 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 9% |
Other | 24 | 22% |
Unknown | 24 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 48% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 6% |
Unknown | 27 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2019.
All research outputs
#7,148,094
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#976
of 3,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,342
of 212,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#16
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,105 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.