↓ Skip to main content

Metabolic markers and microecological characteristics of tongue coating in patients with chronic gastritis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Metabolic markers and microecological characteristics of tongue coating in patients with chronic gastritis
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6882-13-227
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhu-Mei Sun, Jie Zhao, Peng Qian, Yi-Qin Wang, Wei-Fei Zhang, Chun-Rong Guo, Xiao-Yan Pang, Shun-Chun Wang, Fu-Feng Li, Qi Li

Abstract

In Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), tongue diagnosis has been an important diagnostic method for the last 3000 years. Tongue diagnosis is a non-invasive, simple and valuable diagnostic tool. TCM treats the tongue coating on a very sensitive scale that reflects physiological and pathological changes in the organs, especially the spleen and stomach. Tongue coating can diagnose disease severity and determine the TCM syndrome ("Zheng" in Chinese). The biological bases of different tongue coating appearances are still poorly understood and lack systematic investigation at the molecular level.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 3%
Unknown 39 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 18%
Student > Master 6 15%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 7 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 8 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2017.
All research outputs
#2,406,294
of 22,721,584 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#436
of 3,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,845
of 201,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#10
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,721,584 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,620 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,942 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.