↓ Skip to main content

Factors associated with spontaneous abortion: a cross-sectional study of Chinese populations

Overview of attention for article published in Reproductive Health, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
230 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Factors associated with spontaneous abortion: a cross-sectional study of Chinese populations
Published in
Reproductive Health, March 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12978-017-0297-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Danni Zheng, Chunyan Li, Taiwen Wu, Kun Tang

Abstract

Spontaneous abortion (SA) is one of the prevalent negative reproductive outcomes among women around the world, which is a great challenge faced by maternal health promotion. The present study is aimed to explore the association between SA and socioeconomic status (SES) and provides reference for policy makers to improve strategies on maternal health promotion. A cross-sectional analysis was conducted with baseline data from a large-scale population-based cohort study of 0.5 million people from 10 geographically diverse areas of China recruited from 2004 to 2008. The study collected data from 84,531 women aged 35-45 years old in the baseline survey of China Kadoorie Biobank. Participants were interviewed using a standardized questionnaire, and information on demographic-socioeconomic as well as reproductive health status was collected. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% CI, estimated by a multistep logistic regression, were used to approximate the associations between SA occurrence and characteristics of SES. A stratification analysis was also applied to find out how SES influenced women's reproductive health outcomes differently between rural and urban areas. The model was adjusted for age at study date, tea consumption, alcohol consumption, cigarette smoking, and number of induced abortion. The risk of SA in rural was 1.68 times greater than in urban (AOR = 1.68, 95%CI: 1.54-1.84). Women with high income had a decreased risk of SA when compared with that of women with low income (AOR = 0.90, 95%CI: 0.84-0.97). Compared with women in low educational attainment, women in higher educational attainment had a lower prevalence of SA (AOR = 0.90, 95%CI: 0.82-0.98). The risk of SA only reduced in factory worker (AOR = 0.59, 95%CI: 0.53-0.66) and professional worker (AOR = 0.75, 95%CI: 0.66-0.84) compared with agriculture and related workers. After stratifying by rural/urban, the association between income and SA in urban (AOR = 0.88, 95%CI: 0.78-0.99) was stronger than that in rural (AOR = 0.92, 95%CI: 0.84-1.00). Association between education and SA was found in urban (AOR = 0.66, 95%CI: 0.55-0.78) but not in rural (AOR = 1.05, 95%CI: 0.34-1.17), and there was no difference on how occupation impacted SA among women between the two subgroups. Generally women with lower SES status had a higher risk of SA. Lower income and educational attainment were inversely associated with the risk of SA. Women with agricultural and related work had a significantly higher prevalence of SA. Interventions could be targeted more on women with low SES to increase both health profits as well as economic gains for health programs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 230 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 37 16%
Student > Master 21 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 8%
Researcher 16 7%
Student > Postgraduate 16 7%
Other 31 13%
Unknown 91 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 11%
Social Sciences 15 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Other 26 11%
Unknown 96 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,198,335
of 25,813,008 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Health
#218
of 1,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,537
of 324,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Health
#5
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,813,008 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,598 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.