You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Characteristics and outcomes of culture-negative versus culture-positive severe sepsis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc12896 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jason Phua, Wang Jee Ngerng, Kay Choong See, Chee Kiang Tay, Timothy Kiong, Hui Fang Lim, Mei Ying Chew, Hwee Seng Yip, Adeline Tan, Haji Jamil Khalizah, Rolando Capistrano, Kang Hoe Lee, Amartya Mukhopadhyay |
| Abstract |
Culture-negative sepsis is a common but relatively understudied condition. The aim of this study was to compare the characteristics and outcomes of culture-negative versus culture-positive severe sepsis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 336 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 332 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 47 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 12% |
| Other | 36 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 26 | 8% |
| Other | 79 | 24% |
| Unknown | 78 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 152 | 45% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 22 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 13 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 3% |
| Other | 36 | 11% |
| Unknown | 90 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 71. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2019.
All research outputs
#597,133
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#395
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,743
of 210,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#2
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.