You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Resting state EEG abnormalities in autism spectrum disorders
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1866-1955-5-24 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jun Wang, Jamie Barstein, Lauren E Ethridge, Matthew W Mosconi, Yukari Takarae, John A Sweeney |
| Abstract |
Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are a group of complex and heterogeneous developmental disorders involving multiple neural system dysfunctions. In an effort to understand neurophysiological substrates, identify etiopathophysiologically distinct subgroups of patients, and track outcomes of novel treatments with translational biomarkers, EEG (electroencephalography) studies offer a promising research strategy in ASD. Resting-state EEG studies of ASD suggest a U-shaped profile of electrophysiological power alterations, with excessive power in low-frequency and high-frequency bands, abnormal functional connectivity, and enhanced power in the left hemisphere of the brain. In this review, we provide a summary of recent findings, discuss limitations in available research that may contribute to inconsistencies in the literature, and offer suggestions for future research in this area for advancing the understanding of ASD. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 18% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 12% |
| India | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Finland | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 82% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 12% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 583 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 567 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 125 | 21% |
| Researcher | 88 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 71 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 65 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 30 | 5% |
| Other | 87 | 15% |
| Unknown | 117 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 130 | 22% |
| Neuroscience | 110 | 19% |
| Engineering | 47 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 41 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 7% |
| Other | 74 | 13% |
| Unknown | 142 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2023.
All research outputs
#2,182,211
of 25,874,560 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
#75
of 518 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,666
of 200,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,874,560 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 518 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,281 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.