↓ Skip to main content

Exploring the focus of prenatal information offered to pregnant mothers regarding newborn care in rural Uganda

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
201 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exploring the focus of prenatal information offered to pregnant mothers regarding newborn care in rural Uganda
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2393-13-176
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mangwi Richard Ayiasi, Kathleen Van Royen, Roosmarijn Verstraeten, Lynn Atuyambe, Bart Criel, Christopher Orach Garimoi, Patrick Kolsteren

Abstract

Neonatal death accounts for one fifth of all under-five mortality in Uganda. Suboptimal newborn care practices resulting from hypothermia, poor hygiene and delayed initiation of breastfeeding are leading predisposing factors. Evidence suggests focused educational prenatal care messages to mitigate these problems. However, there is a paucity of data on the interaction between the service provider and the prenatal service user. This study aims to understand the scope of educational information and current practices on newborn care from the perspectives of prenatal mothers and health workers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Rwanda 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 197 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 22%
Student > Bachelor 25 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 12%
Researcher 14 7%
Lecturer 12 6%
Other 34 17%
Unknown 47 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 18%
Social Sciences 24 12%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Other 32 16%
Unknown 54 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2017.
All research outputs
#6,213,048
of 23,505,064 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#1,692
of 4,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,313
of 180,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#15
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,505,064 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,945 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.