↓ Skip to main content

Respiratory complex I is essential to induce a Warburg profile in mitochondria-defective tumor cells

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer & Metabolism, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Respiratory complex I is essential to induce a Warburg profile in mitochondria-defective tumor cells
Published in
Cancer & Metabolism, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/2049-3002-1-11
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudia Calabrese, Luisa Iommarini, Ivana Kurelac, Maria Antonietta Calvaruso, Mariantonietta Capristo, Pier-Luigi Lollini, Patrizia Nanni, Christian Bergamini, Giordano Nicoletti, Carla De Giovanni, Anna Ghelli, Valentina Giorgio, Mariano Francesco Caratozzolo, Flaviana Marzano, Caterina Manzari, Christine M Betts, Valerio Carelli, Claudio Ceccarelli, Marcella Attimonelli, Giovanni Romeo, Romana Fato, Michela Rugolo, Apollonia Tullo, Giuseppe Gasparre, Anna Maria Porcelli

Abstract

Aerobic glycolysis, namely the Warburg effect, is the main hallmark of cancer cells. Mitochondrial respiratory dysfunction has been proposed to be one of the major causes for such glycolytic shift. This hypothesis has been revisited as tumors appear to undergo waves of gene regulation during progression, some of which rely on functional mitochondria. In this framework, the role of mitochondrial complex I is still debated, in particular with respect to the effect of mitochondrial DNA mutations in cancer metabolism. The aim of this work is to provide the proof of concept that functional complex I is necessary to sustain tumor progression.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
Unknown 122 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 21%
Researcher 23 18%
Student > Bachelor 16 13%
Student > Master 15 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 4%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 24 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 40 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 9%
Chemistry 6 5%
Engineering 4 3%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 25 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2017.
All research outputs
#18,347,414
of 22,721,584 outputs
Outputs from Cancer & Metabolism
#170
of 204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,134
of 215,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer & Metabolism
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,721,584 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 204 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.