↓ Skip to main content

Origin of phagotrophic eukaryotes as social cheaters in microbial biofilms

Overview of attention for article published in Biology Direct, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Origin of phagotrophic eukaryotes as social cheaters in microbial biofilms
Published in
Biology Direct, January 2007
DOI 10.1186/1745-6150-2-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gáspár Jékely

Abstract

The origin of eukaryotic cells was one of the most dramatic evolutionary transitions in the history of life. It is generally assumed that eukaryotes evolved later then prokaryotes by the transformation or fusion of prokaryotic lineages. However, as yet there is no consensus regarding the nature of the prokaryotic group(s) ancestral to eukaryotes. Regardless of this, a hardly debatable fundamental novel characteristic of the last eukaryotic common ancestor was the ability to exploit prokaryotic biomass by the ingestion of entire cells, i.e. phagocytosis. The recent advances in our understanding of the social life of prokaryotes may help to explain the origin of this form of total exploitation.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Germany 1 1%
Norway 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
Unknown 62 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 27%
Student > Master 10 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Professor 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 12 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 49%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 14%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 4%
Chemical Engineering 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 12 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2023.
All research outputs
#2,838,635
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Biology Direct
#114
of 537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,971
of 173,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology Direct
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,004 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them