↓ Skip to main content

Has carbohydrate-restriction been forgotten as a treatment for diabetes mellitus? A perspective on the ACCORD study design

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition & Metabolism, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 1,012)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
269 X users
facebook
9 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor
video
4 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Has carbohydrate-restriction been forgotten as a treatment for diabetes mellitus? A perspective on the ACCORD study design
Published in
Nutrition & Metabolism, April 2008
DOI 10.1186/1743-7075-5-10
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eric C Westman, Mary C Vernon

Abstract

Prior to the discovery of medical treatment for diabetes, carbohydrate-restriction was the predominant treatment recommendation to treat diabetes mellitus. In this commentary we argue that carbohydrate-restriction should be reincorporated into contemporary treatment studies for diabetes mellitus.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 269 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
Unknown 60 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 19%
Student > Bachelor 11 17%
Student > Master 9 14%
Student > Postgraduate 6 9%
Other 5 8%
Other 14 22%
Unknown 7 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Other 12 19%
Unknown 8 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 228. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2022.
All research outputs
#166,212
of 25,381,864 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition & Metabolism
#26
of 1,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#263
of 93,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition & Metabolism
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,381,864 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,012 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,178 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.