↓ Skip to main content

Validation of an osteoporosis self-assessment tool to identify primary osteoporosis and new osteoporotic vertebral fractures in postmenopausal Chinese women in Beijing

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Validation of an osteoporosis self-assessment tool to identify primary osteoporosis and new osteoporotic vertebral fractures in postmenopausal Chinese women in Beijing
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-14-271
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yong Yang, BingQiang Wang, Qi Fei, Qian Meng, Dong Li, Hai Tang, JinJun Li, Nan Su

Abstract

This study aimed to validate the effectiveness of the Osteoporosis Self-assessment Tool for Asians (OSTA) in identifying postmenopausal women at increased risk of primary osteoporosis and painful new osteoporotic vertebral fractures in a large selected Han Chinese population in Beijing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 19%
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Other 4 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 8%
Other 11 21%
Unknown 14 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 15%
Sports and Recreations 4 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Psychology 2 4%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 14 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2013.
All research outputs
#18,348,542
of 22,723,682 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#3,115
of 4,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,489
of 202,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#75
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,723,682 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,029 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.