↓ Skip to main content

Development and Standardization of a Furosemide Stress Test to Predict the Severity of Acute Kidney Injury

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
134 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
170 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
244 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development and Standardization of a Furosemide Stress Test to Predict the Severity of Acute Kidney Injury
Published in
Critical Care, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/cc13015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lakhmir S Chawla, Danielle L Davison, Ermira Brasha-Mitchell, Jay L Koyner, John M Arthur, Andrew D Shaw, James A Tumlin, Sharon A Trevino, Paul L Kimmel, Michael G Seneff

Abstract

In the setting of early acute kidney injury (AKI), no test has been shown to definitively predict the progression to more severe stages.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 134 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 244 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 3 1%
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 232 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 47 19%
Other 37 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 10%
Researcher 23 9%
Student > Master 20 8%
Other 65 27%
Unknown 28 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 172 70%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Computer Science 3 1%
Other 17 7%
Unknown 37 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 103. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2019.
All research outputs
#228,596
of 17,028,720 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#131
of 5,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,349
of 174,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#1
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,028,720 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,377 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.