You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A school intervention for mental health literacy in adolescents: effects of a non-randomized cluster controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-873 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ingunn Skre, Oddgeir Friborg, Camilla Breivik, Lars Inge Johnsen, Yngvild Arnesen, Catharina Elisabeth Arfwedson Wang |
| Abstract |
"Mental health for everyone" is a school program for mental health literacy and prevention aimed at secondary schools (13-15 yrs). The main aim was to investigate whether mental health literacy, could be improved by a 3-days universal education programme by: a) improving naming of symptom profiles of mental disorder, b) reducing prejudiced beliefs, and c) improving knowledge about where to seek help for mental health problems. A secondary aim was to investigate whether adolescent sex and age influenced the above mentioned variables. A third aim was to investigate whether prejudiced beliefs influenced knowledge about available help. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 25% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 17% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 322 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 317 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 57 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 52 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 34 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 25 | 8% |
| Researcher | 20 | 6% |
| Other | 55 | 17% |
| Unknown | 79 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 93 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 38 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 32 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 22 | 7% |
| Unknown | 90 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2015.
All research outputs
#4,378,772
of 24,848,516 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#4,920
of 16,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,889
of 209,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#97
of 287 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,848,516 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,495 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,071 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 287 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.