You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Dynamics of bone healing after osteotomy with piezosurgery or conventional drilling– histomorphometrical, immunohistochemical, and molecular analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Translational Medicine, September 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1479-5876-11-221 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jônatas Caldeira Esteves, Elcio Marcantonio Jr, Ana Paula de Souza Faloni, Fernanda Regina Godoy Rocha, Rosemary Adriana Marcantonio, Katarzyna Wilk, Giuseppe Intini |
Abstract |
Piezosurgery is an osteotomy system used in medical and dental surgery. Many studies have proven clinical advantages of piezosurgery in terms of quality of cut, maneuverability, ease of use, and safety. However, few investigations have tested its superiority over the traditional osteotomy systems in terms of dynamics of bone healing. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the dynamics of bone healing after osteotomies with piezosurgery and to compare them with those associated to traditional bone drilling. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 84 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 21 | 25% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 14% |
Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 9% |
Researcher | 7 | 8% |
Other | 5 | 6% |
Other | 11 | 13% |
Unknown | 21 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 55% |
Engineering | 7 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 2% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 1% |
Other | 3 | 4% |
Unknown | 23 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2013.
All research outputs
#20,203,867
of 22,723,682 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#3,303
of 3,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,413
of 202,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#36
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,723,682 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,973 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,769 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.