↓ Skip to main content

Dynamics of bone healing after osteotomy with piezosurgery or conventional drilling– histomorphometrical, immunohistochemical, and molecular analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dynamics of bone healing after osteotomy with piezosurgery or conventional drilling– histomorphometrical, immunohistochemical, and molecular analysis
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1479-5876-11-221
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jônatas Caldeira Esteves, Elcio Marcantonio Jr, Ana Paula de Souza Faloni, Fernanda Regina Godoy Rocha, Rosemary Adriana Marcantonio, Katarzyna Wilk, Giuseppe Intini

Abstract

Piezosurgery is an osteotomy system used in medical and dental surgery. Many studies have proven clinical advantages of piezosurgery in terms of quality of cut, maneuverability, ease of use, and safety. However, few investigations have tested its superiority over the traditional osteotomy systems in terms of dynamics of bone healing. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the dynamics of bone healing after osteotomies with piezosurgery and to compare them with those associated to traditional bone drilling.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 84 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 14%
Student > Postgraduate 8 9%
Researcher 7 8%
Other 5 6%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 21 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 55%
Engineering 7 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Social Sciences 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 23 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2013.
All research outputs
#20,203,867
of 22,723,682 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#3,303
of 3,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,413
of 202,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#36
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,723,682 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,973 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,769 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.